Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implement permissions #60

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024
Merged

implement permissions #60

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

mehdi-torabiv
Copy link
Collaborator

@mehdi-torabiv mehdi-torabiv commented Aug 28, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced CustomTable component to display "No Data" when application data is unavailable.
    • Integrated loading feedback in the Permissions component during data fetching.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of permissions and attestations to prevent potential runtime errors.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined data fetching and state management in the Permissions component.
    • Removed unnecessary console logs and unused imports for better performance and clarity.
    • Updated logic for rendering attestations to enhance robustness and clarity.

@mehdi-torabiv mehdi-torabiv self-assigned this Aug 28, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 28, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@mehdi-torabiv has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 95099d9 and 42622b7.

Walkthrough

The changes across the codebase involve modifications to the rendering logic and data handling in the CustomTable, Permissions, and Attestation components, alongside a significant reduction in the implementation of the useGetAttestations function. These updates enhance data processing and improve error handling while streamlining component interactions and removing unused code.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/components/shared/CustomTable.tsx Enhanced rendering logic for AccessControlButton, removed console logs, added fallback for undefined application.
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx Added type assertion for attester to ensure it is treated as a string, enhancing type safety.
src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx Refactored Permissions component to use useGetAttestations hook, improved state management, and updated rendering logic with a loading backdrop.
src/services/eas/query.ts Commented out the entire useGetAttestations function implementation, indicating a potential refactor or change in data retrieval approach.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Permissions
    participant CustomTable
    participant useGetAttestations

    User->>Permissions: Request permissions data
    Permissions->>useGetAttestations: Fetch attestations
    useGetAttestations-->>Permissions: Return attestations
    Permissions->>Permissions: Process attestations
    Permissions->>CustomTable: Render table with permissions
    CustomTable-->>User: Display permissions
Loading

🐇✨
In the meadow where changes bloom,
Code now dances, banishing gloom.
With buttons bright and tables clear,
Data flows like a song to cheer.
Hops of joy, let’s celebrate,
A codebase fresh, we elevate!
🌼🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/services/eas/query.ts (1)

Impact of Commenting Out useGetAttestations:

The useGetAttestations function is imported and used in the following files:

  • src/pages/Identifiers/Identifiers.tsx
  • src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx

Commenting out this function will affect these components, as they rely on it for fetching attestations. You should ensure that these components are updated to handle the absence of this function or replace it with an alternative implementation.

  • Identifiers.tsx:

    • Line: import { useGetAttestations } from '../../services/eas/query';
    • Line: const { data: attestationsResponse, refetch } = useGetAttestations();
  • Permissions.tsx:

    • Line: import { useGetAttestations } from '../../services/eas/query';
    • Line: useGetAttestations();
Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-1: Verify the impact of commenting out useGetAttestations.

The entire function useGetAttestations has been commented out. This is a significant change as it affects how attestations are fetched and processed. Ensure that this change is reflected across all components that previously depended on this function.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if other parts of the application are affected by the removal of `useGetAttestations`.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No occurrences of the function usage.
rg --type python -A 5 $'useGetAttestations'

Length of output: 73


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if other parts of the application are affected by the removal of `useGetAttestations`.

# Test: Search for the function usage in TypeScript files. Expect: No occurrences of the function usage.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'useGetAttestations'

Length of output: 81


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if other parts of the application are affected by the removal of `useGetAttestations`.

# Test: Search for the function usage in TypeScript files. Expect: No occurrences of the function usage.
rg --glob '*.ts' -A 5 $'useGetAttestations'

Length of output: 391


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any imports or references to `useGetAttestations` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for imports or references to `useGetAttestations`. Expect: No occurrences.
rg 'useGetAttestations'

Length of output: 467

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 381f919 and 2857603.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/components/shared/CustomTable.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/services/eas/query.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: test/node 17/ubuntu-latest
src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx

[failure] 68-68:
Property 'map' does not exist on type '{}'.


[failure] 68-68:
Parameter 'application' implicitly has an 'any' type.


[failure] 89-89:
Parameter 'permissionResult' implicitly has an 'any' type.


[failure] 89-89:
Parameter 'index' implicitly has an 'any' type.


[failure] 90-90:
'applications' is of type 'unknown'.


[failure] 91-91:
'applications' is of type 'unknown'.


[failure] 98-98:
'applications' is of type 'unknown'.


[failure] 106-106:
'applications' is of type 'unknown'.


[failure] 107-107:
'applications' is of type 'unknown'.


[failure] 117-117:
Type '{ id: string | undefined; provider: string; uid: string | undefined; }[]' is not assignable to type 'Platform[]'.

GitHub Check: test/node 18/ubuntu-latest
src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx

[failure] 68-68:
Property 'map' does not exist on type '{}'.


[failure] 68-68:
Parameter 'application' implicitly has an 'any' type.


[failure] 89-89:
Parameter 'permissionResult' implicitly has an 'any' type.


[failure] 89-89:
Parameter 'index' implicitly has an 'any' type.


[failure] 90-90:
'applications' is of type 'unknown'.


[failure] 91-91:
'applications' is of type 'unknown'.


[failure] 98-98:
'applications' is of type 'unknown'.


[failure] 106-106:
'applications' is of type 'unknown'.


[failure] 107-107:
'applications' is of type 'unknown'.


[failure] 117-117:
Type '{ id: string | undefined; provider: string; uid: string | undefined; }[]' is not assignable to type 'Platform[]'.

Additional comments not posted (1)
src/components/shared/CustomTable.tsx (1)

89-98: Improved error handling and UI feedback in CustomTable.

The update to the rendering logic of AccessControlButton to include a conditional check for the application object enhances robustness. This prevents potential runtime errors and improves user experience by providing clear feedback when no data is available.

The changes are well-implemented and improve the component's reliability.

src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2857603 and 95099d9.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx (1)

68-85: Verify the correctness and efficiency of contract calls generation.

The generation of contract calls using flatMap and map could be inefficient or error-prone if the data structures are not as expected.

Verify that the attestations and applications arrays always contain the expected data before generating contract calls. Consider adding checks or using TypeScript generics to enforce data integrity.

Verification successful

Contract Calls Generation is Correct and Efficient

The contract calls generation using flatMap and map is correctly implemented. The attestations and applications arrays are properly structured and handled, ensuring data integrity and efficiency. The use of useMemo, useEffect, and optional chaining provides safeguards against potential issues. No changes are necessary.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the data integrity of attestations and applications arrays.

# Test: Check the data types and structures in the arrays.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'attestations.flatMap' src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'applications.map' src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx

Length of output: 239


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Searching for the definitions of 'attestations' and 'applications' in the file to understand their structure.
rg 'attestations' src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx -A 3 -B 3
rg 'applications' src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx -A 3 -B 3

Length of output: 4095

src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (1)

141-141: Good implementation of type safety.

The explicit type assertion for attester as a string is a good practice to ensure type correctness and prevent runtime errors.

This change enhances type safety and aligns with TypeScript best practices.

src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/Permissions/Permissions.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mehdi-torabiv mehdi-torabiv merged commit a6de7cc into main Aug 28, 2024
6 checks passed
This was referenced Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant